Structured online KROK preparation, mapped to the published exam format and the Ukrainian Testing Board requirements.
Practice question bank
A timed mock test built around the real exam format, with flagging, a question navigator and a full answer review at the end. Start at no cost - the first questions cost nothing - and your scores are saved so you can watch your progress build.
Checking your account...
Practice questions are written for revision purposes only and are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sourced from any examination board.
The KROK is a decisive step in a global medical career, and most candidates prepare for it while working clinical hours or finishing a degree. This WispGold programme is built around the published KROK structure - a licensing multiple-choice examination sat in stages during and after the medical degree - so your revision follows the assessment rather than guessing at it. You begin with a diagnostic review that maps your current knowledge against the examinable content: basic sciences for KROK 1 and clinical disciplines for KROK 2, as taught in Ukrainian medical schools. From there, structured modules move from core principles to the applied reasoning examiners actually reward, taught by clinicians and educators who have prepared candidates for this exam repeatedly. Teaching stays deliberately practical: what each question style is really testing, how marks are awarded, where candidates lose easy points, and how to manage timing under pressure. Weekly graded question sets and full timed mocks give you a measurable score trend instead of a vague sense of progress, and every mock returns with written feedback and a revised study plan. Regulatory context matters as much as content for a licensing exam, so the course also walks you through how the Ukrainian Testing Board handles eligibility, documentation, scheduling and re-sits - and where to verify each of those on the official testcentr.org.ua pages, because requirements do change. Because our cohorts are international, live sessions run in rotating time slots and everything is recorded; you keep access for twelve months from enrolment, along with the tutor channel and mock library. WispGold is an independent exam-preparation provider and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or an official representative of the Ukrainian Testing Board (Centre for Testing of Professional Competence) under the Ministry of Health of Ukraine. Always confirm current exam requirements directly with the Ukrainian Testing Board (testcentr.org.ua).
This is a complete KROK preparation course built for a global audience. It covers KROK online course, KROK mock exams, KROK syllabus and format, KROK course for international candidates, the Ukrainian Testing Board exam preparation - the areas candidates most often tell us they struggle with when revising alone. Teaching is aligned with the published syllabus and current guidance; WispGold is an independent training provider and is not the awarding body.
A guided walk through the examinable content - basic sciences for KROK 1 and clinical disciplines for KROK 2, as taught in Ukrainian medical schools - with a diagnostic assessment so your plan targets real gaps.
Short, focused lessons on the highest-yield content, with worked examples and summary sheets you can revise from in the final fortnight.
Structured practice in the exact assessment style: a licensing multiple-choice examination sat in stages during and after the medical degree.
Weekly graded sets that build accuracy first and exam-day speed second, with explanations for every option.
Timed mocks marked against examiner-style criteria, returned with a written report and an updated revision plan.
How eligibility, documentation, booking and re-sits work in practice, and how to verify current rules on the official testcentr.org.ua pages.
The KROK programme runs across 8 chapters and 31 lessons, roughly 22 hours of guided study, finishing with full timed mock exams in your student area.
Before teaching starts you sit a short diagnostic mock for KROK, meet your tutor and receive a personalised study timetable built around your sitting date.
A clear map of the KROK format: sections, question styles, timing and how marks are awarded.
A scored diagnostic in the student area that highlights your strongest and weakest topics.
Turn your diagnostic report into a realistic weekly plan that fits around clinical shifts or study.
By the end of this chapter: Know your starting score, your weakest topics and exactly what to study in week one.
A guided walk through the examinable content - basic sciences for KROK 1 and clinical disciplines for KROK 2, as taught in Ukrainian medical schools - with a diagnostic assessment so your plan targets real gaps.
A structured walk through the examinable core of krok blueprint mapping and diagnostics, with the definitions, mechanisms and guidelines examiners expect you to quote accurately.
Case-based teaching that turns krok blueprint mapping and diagnostics theory into clinical or exam decisions, including the reasoning steps that earn marks and the traps that lose them.
Timed question practice on krok blueprint mapping and diagnostics, with worked explanations for every option so you learn why the wrong answers are wrong.
Spaced-recall summaries, flashcard sets and a short checkpoint quiz that confirms krok blueprint mapping and diagnostics is retained before you move on.
By the end of this chapter: Confidently explain the foundations of krok blueprint mapping and diagnostics and pass the chapter checkpoint quiz.
Short, focused lessons on the highest-yield content, with worked examples and summary sheets you can revise from in the final fortnight.
A structured walk through the examinable core of core knowledge modules, with the definitions, mechanisms and guidelines examiners expect you to quote accurately.
Case-based teaching that turns core knowledge modules theory into clinical or exam decisions, including the reasoning steps that earn marks and the traps that lose them.
Timed question practice on core knowledge modules, with worked explanations for every option so you learn why the wrong answers are wrong.
Spaced-recall summaries, flashcard sets and a short checkpoint quiz that confirms core knowledge modules is retained before you move on.
By the end of this chapter: Apply core knowledge modules to unseen cases and justify your answer the way examiners expect.
Structured practice in the exact assessment style: a licensing multiple-choice examination sat in stages during and after the medical degree.
A structured walk through the examinable core of applied reasoning and case work, with the definitions, mechanisms and guidelines examiners expect you to quote accurately.
Case-based teaching that turns applied reasoning and case work theory into clinical or exam decisions, including the reasoning steps that earn marks and the traps that lose them.
Timed question practice on applied reasoning and case work, with worked explanations for every option so you learn why the wrong answers are wrong.
Spaced-recall summaries, flashcard sets and a short checkpoint quiz that confirms applied reasoning and case work is retained before you move on.
By the end of this chapter: Apply applied reasoning and case work to unseen cases and justify your answer the way examiners expect.
Weekly graded sets that build accuracy first and exam-day speed second, with explanations for every option.
A structured walk through the examinable core of question banks and timed drills, with the definitions, mechanisms and guidelines examiners expect you to quote accurately.
Case-based teaching that turns question banks and timed drills theory into clinical or exam decisions, including the reasoning steps that earn marks and the traps that lose them.
Timed question practice on question banks and timed drills, with worked explanations for every option so you learn why the wrong answers are wrong.
Spaced-recall summaries, flashcard sets and a short checkpoint quiz that confirms question banks and timed drills is retained before you move on.
By the end of this chapter: Apply question banks and timed drills to unseen cases and justify your answer the way examiners expect.
Timed mocks marked against examiner-style criteria, returned with a written report and an updated revision plan.
A structured walk through the examinable core of full mock assessments and feedback, with the definitions, mechanisms and guidelines examiners expect you to quote accurately.
Case-based teaching that turns full mock assessments and feedback theory into clinical or exam decisions, including the reasoning steps that earn marks and the traps that lose them.
Timed question practice on full mock assessments and feedback, with worked explanations for every option so you learn why the wrong answers are wrong.
Spaced-recall summaries, flashcard sets and a short checkpoint quiz that confirms full mock assessments and feedback is retained before you move on.
By the end of this chapter: Apply full mock assessments and feedback to unseen cases and justify your answer the way examiners expect.
How eligibility, documentation, booking and re-sits work in practice, and how to verify current rules on the official testcentr.org.ua pages.
A structured walk through the examinable core of regulatory pathway and the ukrainian testing board logistics, with the definitions, mechanisms and guidelines examiners expect you to quote accurately.
Case-based teaching that turns regulatory pathway and the ukrainian testing board logistics theory into clinical or exam decisions, including the reasoning steps that earn marks and the traps that lose them.
Timed question practice on regulatory pathway and the ukrainian testing board logistics, with worked explanations for every option so you learn why the wrong answers are wrong.
Spaced-recall summaries, flashcard sets and a short checkpoint quiz that confirms regulatory pathway and the ukrainian testing board logistics is retained before you move on.
By the end of this chapter: Answer full exam-standard questions on regulatory pathway and the ukrainian testing board logistics within the real time limit.
The closing block is pure exam rehearsal: full timed mocks for KROK, score-report reviews with a tutor, and a targeted plan for the last two weeks.
A complete mock under exam conditions in the student area, marked instantly with explanations.
A tutor-led review of your mock report, converting weak topics into a short revision list.
A rapid pass over the facts, algorithms and phrases that appear most often in the real paper.
Pacing, flagging, guessing policy and nerves management for the day itself.
By the end of this chapter: Sit full mocks at or above the pass threshold and walk in with a written exam-day plan.
Subject-by-subject notes matched to the official licensing or entrance syllabus, with high-yield tables.
Timed papers that mirror the real question count and pacing, plus per-topic mini banks.
Live session where tutors work through the questions the cohort found hardest that week.
Documents, timelines and registration steps so administration never delays your sitting.
Self-paced recorded lessons plus two live small-group sessions each week, all recorded. Around 8–10 hours of study per week over 14 weeks suits most working professionals.
This course is led by senior clinicians and educators who prepare candidates for the KROK full time. They mark your mocks personally, run the live sessions, and stay reachable in the cohort mentor channel throughout your 12-month access period.
"I had failed OET twice before finding WispGold. Sarah broke down every letter task in a way I finally understood, and the speaking clinics gave me the confidence to answer a real patient without freezing. Passed with a B in every sub-skill on my next sitting."
70 student reviews
The timed KROK mock test helped me notice how long I spent comparing similar options. I now practise choosing an answer and moving on rather than losing time on one question.
Reviewing my KROK answers gave me a clearer revision focus. I grouped my mistakes around core knowledge and applied decision-making instead of reading every topic again.
I used the KROK mock test as a baseline, not a prediction of my official result. It helped me separate gaps in knowledge from questions I had simply misread.
For KROK, the most useful habit was reviewing uncertain answers even when I got them right. A correct guess did not mean I understood the topic.
The KROK timer made me practise under pressure. I could see why I needed both subject revision and better pacing before attempting a longer official-format paper.
After the KROK mock test, I wrote down one learning point per mistake and returned to the relevant guidance. That made the next revision session more focused.
The KROK question review showed patterns I had missed in ordinary revision. Several errors came from changing a correct first answer without a clear reason.
I completed the KROK mock in one uninterrupted sitting. It was useful for testing concentration as well as my knowledge of core knowledge and applied decision-making.
The answer explanations in the KROK mock helped me understand why the distractors were less appropriate, not just which option was correct.
My first KROK mock score highlighted weaker areas in core knowledge and applied decision-making. I used that result to plan the following week instead of revising at random.
I repeated the KROK mock-test routine after focused revision. Comparing my approach helped me see whether my pacing and decision-making had improved.
The KROK mock made me practise reading every qualifier in the question. Words such as first, most appropriate and immediate changed several answers.
Using the KROK timer showed that I was rushing the opening section and slowing down later. I now keep a steadier pace across the whole paper.
I reviewed every incorrect KROK response against the relevant topic rather than memorising the answer. That made the exercise feel like structured revision.
The KROK mock was useful before choosing an exam date. It gave me a realistic view of the work still needed without claiming to predict my result.
I practised the KROK mock on the same device I planned to use for revision. The format felt familiar and I could focus on the questions rather than navigation.
The range of KROK scenarios exposed gaps that short topic quizzes had not found, especially where core knowledge and applied decision-making had to be applied together.
I marked uncertain answers during the KROK mock and reviewed them afterwards. This helped distinguish genuine knowledge from lucky guesses.
The KROK mock encouraged me to make decisions from the information provided instead of adding assumptions that were not in the scenario.
I used the KROK results to build a simple error log. Sorting mistakes by knowledge, interpretation and timing made my next revision steps clearer.
Completing a full KROK mock helped me plan short checkpoints. I could monitor time without repeatedly watching the clock.
The KROK explanations helped me revisit core knowledge and applied decision-making with a purpose. I concentrated on the reasoning behind each answer rather than collecting more notes.
I attempted the KROK mock after a week of targeted revision. The comparison showed where I had improved and where I still needed more practice.
The realistic pacing of the KROK mock revealed that I needed faster recall on familiar topics. That was difficult to notice in untimed study sessions.
For the KROK mock, I answered straightforward questions first and flagged the harder ones. This reduced the time I previously lost on a single scenario.
The KROK mock covered enough variation to challenge my understanding of core knowledge and applied decision-making. It was more useful than repeating questions from one narrow chapter.
Reviewing the KROK mock reminded me that a high practice score is not a guarantee. I treated it as feedback and continued revising weaker objectives.
I found the KROK mock most valuable when I reviewed it the next day. With fresh attention, I could identify why I had misread several stems.
The KROK mock helped me balance speed with accuracy. I now pause briefly to identify what the question is asking before looking at the options.
I used the KROK mock to rehearse a calm exam routine, including breaks beforehand and removing distractions. That made the timed session more consistent.
After finishing the KROK mock, I turned each mistake into a short revision task. The feedback gave my preparation a clear and manageable direction.
The timed KROK mock test helped me notice how long I spent comparing similar options. I now practise choosing an answer and moving on rather than losing time on one question.
Reviewing my KROK answers gave me a clearer revision focus. I grouped my mistakes around core knowledge and applied decision-making instead of reading every topic again.
I used the KROK mock test as a baseline, not a prediction of my official result. It helped me separate gaps in knowledge from questions I had simply misread.
For KROK, the most useful habit was reviewing uncertain answers even when I got them right. A correct guess did not mean I understood the topic.
The KROK timer made me practise under pressure. I could see why I needed both subject revision and better pacing before attempting a longer official-format paper.
After the KROK mock test, I wrote down one learning point per mistake and returned to the relevant guidance. That made the next revision session more focused.
The KROK question review showed patterns I had missed in ordinary revision. Several errors came from changing a correct first answer without a clear reason.
I completed the KROK mock in one uninterrupted sitting. It was useful for testing concentration as well as my knowledge of core knowledge and applied decision-making.
The answer explanations in the KROK mock helped me understand why the distractors were less appropriate, not just which option was correct.
My first KROK mock score highlighted weaker areas in core knowledge and applied decision-making. I used that result to plan the following week instead of revising at random.
I repeated the KROK mock-test routine after focused revision. Comparing my approach helped me see whether my pacing and decision-making had improved.
The KROK mock made me practise reading every qualifier in the question. Words such as first, most appropriate and immediate changed several answers.
Using the KROK timer showed that I was rushing the opening section and slowing down later. I now keep a steadier pace across the whole paper.
I reviewed every incorrect KROK response against the relevant topic rather than memorising the answer. That made the exercise feel like structured revision.
The KROK mock was useful before choosing an exam date. It gave me a realistic view of the work still needed without claiming to predict my result.
I practised the KROK mock on the same device I planned to use for revision. The format felt familiar and I could focus on the questions rather than navigation.
The range of KROK scenarios exposed gaps that short topic quizzes had not found, especially where core knowledge and applied decision-making had to be applied together.
I marked uncertain answers during the KROK mock and reviewed them afterwards. This helped distinguish genuine knowledge from lucky guesses.
The KROK mock encouraged me to make decisions from the information provided instead of adding assumptions that were not in the scenario.
I used the KROK results to build a simple error log. Sorting mistakes by knowledge, interpretation and timing made my next revision steps clearer.
Completing a full KROK mock helped me plan short checkpoints. I could monitor time without repeatedly watching the clock.
The KROK explanations helped me revisit core knowledge and applied decision-making with a purpose. I concentrated on the reasoning behind each answer rather than collecting more notes.
I attempted the KROK mock after a week of targeted revision. The comparison showed where I had improved and where I still needed more practice.
The realistic pacing of the KROK mock revealed that I needed faster recall on familiar topics. That was difficult to notice in untimed study sessions.
For the KROK mock, I answered straightforward questions first and flagged the harder ones. This reduced the time I previously lost on a single scenario.
The KROK mock covered enough variation to challenge my understanding of core knowledge and applied decision-making. It was more useful than repeating questions from one narrow chapter.
Reviewing the KROK mock reminded me that a high practice score is not a guarantee. I treated it as feedback and continued revising weaker objectives.
I found the KROK mock most valuable when I reviewed it the next day. With fresh attention, I could identify why I had misread several stems.
The KROK mock helped me balance speed with accuracy. I now pause briefly to identify what the question is asking before looking at the options.
I used the KROK mock to rehearse a calm exam routine, including breaks beforehand and removing distractions. That made the timed session more consistent.
After finishing the KROK mock, I turned each mistake into a short revision task. The feedback gave my preparation a clear and manageable direction.
The timed KROK mock test helped me notice how long I spent comparing similar options. I now practise choosing an answer and moving on rather than losing time on one question.
Reviewing my KROK answers gave me a clearer revision focus. I grouped my mistakes around core knowledge and applied decision-making instead of reading every topic again.
I used the KROK mock test as a baseline, not a prediction of my official result. It helped me separate gaps in knowledge from questions I had simply misread.
For KROK, the most useful habit was reviewing uncertain answers even when I got them right. A correct guess did not mean I understood the topic.
The KROK timer made me practise under pressure. I could see why I needed both subject revision and better pacing before attempting a longer official-format paper.
After the KROK mock test, I wrote down one learning point per mistake and returned to the relevant guidance. That made the next revision session more focused.
The KROK question review showed patterns I had missed in ordinary revision. Several errors came from changing a correct first answer without a clear reason.
I completed the KROK mock in one uninterrupted sitting. It was useful for testing concentration as well as my knowledge of core knowledge and applied decision-making.
WispGold is an independent exam-preparation provider and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or an official representative of the Ukrainian Testing Board (Centre for Testing of Professional Competence) under the Ministry of Health of Ukraine. Always confirm current exam requirements directly with the Ukrainian Testing Board (testcentr.org.ua).
Fill in a few details and our student advisor will confirm your seat within one working day and email over the joining details.
What the Saudi Medical Licensing Exam actually tests, how long to prepare, and the study plan our highest scorers follow.
Dubai, Abu Dhabi and the northern emirates each run their own licensing route. Here is how the exams differ, which one matches your job offer, and how to prepare once.
The IMAT is one of the few affordable routes into an English-taught, EU-recognised medical degree. Here is what it tests, how scoring works, and how to prepare in six months.
Structured online IMAT preparation, mapped to the published exam format and MUR requirements.
Structured online NEET-UG preparation, mapped to the published exam format and NTA requirements.
Structured online NEET-PG preparation, mapped to the published exam format and NBEMS requirements.
Book a 20-minute consultation with our team and we'll map out your best next step.